Biden’s long-awaited report on the origins of COVID comes to NOTHING:

Biden’s long-awaited report on the origins of COVID comes to NOTHING:

Intelligent assessment to discover if the virus was released from Wuhan is inconclusive because China did not help

  • President Joe Biden reportedly received a classified intelligence report on Tuesday revealing the origins of COVID-19 are still unknown
  • It came 90 days after the president tasked intelligence agencies to create a report on the origins as questions swirled about how COVID began
  • Received a report at the time saying community had ‘coalesced behind two likely scenarios’
  • Some believed the virus originated in a lab in China that was studying coronaviruses, while others claimed it spread naturally to humans from animals
  • The intelligence community struggled to come up with an answer as they tried to get ‘as much information as possible’ from resources across the country
  • In June, Director of National Intelligence Avril Hines said she thought both theories were plausible

By Melissa Koenig For Dailymail.Com

Published: 00:40 EDT, 25 August 2021 | Updated: 10:02 EDT, 25 August 2021

A long-awaited report commissioned by President Biden into the origins of Covid has come back inconclusive – in part because Beijing refused access to crucial information.

The debate over the origins of the virus that has killed more than four million people and paralyzed economies worldwide has become increasingly contentious.

90 days ago, the President ordered a new investigation into the origins of the virus, hoping to conclusively uncover its source.

A long-awaited report commissioned by President Biden (pictured) into whether Covid was released from a lab in China has come back inconclusive – in part because Beijing refused access to information 

Part of the problem is a lack of detailed information from China, according to the Wall Street Journal.

‘If China’s not going to give access to certain data sets, you’re never really going to know,’ an official told the Journal on condition of anonymity since the report is not public.

The basis for Biden’s investigation stemmed from a report from intelligence agencies saying that they had ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios, according to Yahoo News.

The first theory was that coronavirus spread to humans naturally from diseased animals at a wet market in Wuhan, China.

While the other theorized that the virus was leaked from the nearby Wuhan Institute of Virology, where Chinese scientists were experimenting on the virus. 

In the face of China’s reluctance to open up to outside investigators, experts are increasingly open to considering the theory that the virus might have leaked out of a lab conducting bat coronavirus research in Wuhan, an idea once dismissed as a conspiracy propagated by the US far-right.

WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has admitted that the global health body’s initial probe into Wuhan’s virology labs did not go far enough.

But the WHO’s call last month for the investigation’s second stage to include audits of the labs infuriated Beijing. Vice health minister Zeng Yixin said the plan showed ‘disrespect for common sense and arrogance towards science.’

With the report coming back inconclusive, the Post writes that intelligence agents will seek to declassify certain elements of the document in the coming days.

Director of National Intelligence Avril Hines cautioned in June that the agencies may not be able to solve the mystery.

‘We’re hoping to find a smoking gun,’ she told Yahoo News. But, she said, ‘it’s challenging to do that adding ‘it might happen, but it might not.’ 

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is one of only a handful in the world that is cleared to handle Class 4 pathogens ¿ dangerous viruses that pose a high risk of person-to-person transmission

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is one of only a handful in the world that is cleared to handle Class 4 pathogens — dangerous viruses that pose a high risk of person-to-person transmission

She said she had been closely overseeing the review – which involved dozens of analysts and intelligence officials across multiple agencies – and was regularly briefed by analysts who backed the rival theories.

She deployed ‘red cells’ or contrarian groups to test analyst assumptions and ensure the intelligence is scrutinized from every angle, she said.

‘I don’t know between these two plausible theories which one is the right answer,’ Hines admitted. ‘But I’ve listened to the analysts, and I really see why it is that they perceive these two theories as being in a contest with each other and why it’s very challenging for them to assess one over the other.’

Hines had tried to tap into resources across the intelligence community ‘to ensure we have as much information and any information that they might have on the table.’

She said her agencies

‘are trying to get as much information as possible, new information that could be applied against the challenge, but also just brainstorming about different ways to approach the problem that might reveal new information that you hadn’t thought could be relevant might be useful,’ but her efforts were stymied by Chinese officials.  

Hines said efforts to find out about the origins of the virus were stymied by Chinese officials

Hines said efforts to find out about the origins of the virus were stymied by Chinese officials

Three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology reported COVID-like symptoms in November 2019, before the virus began to spread around the world

Another official said the intelligence community is ‘not necessarily best equipped to solve this problem,’ which is fundamentally an issue of science.

Although spy services are ‘positioned to collect on a range of foreign actors’ they are not necessarily poised to dive into global health datasets.

The president said so himself in July, the Post reports when he said: ‘You’re going to have to increase your ranks with people with significant scientific capacity relative to pathogens.’

Many scientists familiar with the origin debate had been skeptical of the 90-day deadline, saying it would take years of research to reach a conclusion about the origins of the virus.

Others have said its true origins may never be known, amid widespread speculation of a huge Chinese government cover-up.  

‘We should not even be thinking about closing the book or backing off, but rather ratcheting up the effort,’ said David Relman, a Stanford University microbiologist who has pushed for a broad investigation of all origin hypotheses.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology kept live bats in cages, Sky News reported

The Wuhan Institute of Virology kept live bats in cages, Sky News reportedShi Zhengli, known as China's "bat woman" for her virus-hunting expeditions in bat caves, releases a fruit bat after taking blood and swab samples from it in 2004

Shi Zhengli, known as China’s ‘bat woman’ for her virus-hunting expeditions in bat caves, releases a fruit bat after taking blood and swab samples from it in 2004

The lab leak theory has gained traction since May, with NIAID head Dr. Anthony Fauci suggesting it is possible and President Joseph Biden joining other world leaders in calling for an investigation into the origins of the virus. 

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is one of only a handful in the world that is cleared to handle Class 4 pathogens — dangerous viruses that pose a high risk of person-to-person transmission.

It is located only a few miles from the Huanan wet market, where scientists say the first cluster of infections were officially reported, and scientists in the lab were reportedly conducting experiments on bats before the pandemic began. 

Three researchers from the institute sought medical care in November 2019, before the virus began to spread, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal. 

The newspaper said the report – which provides fresh details on the number of researchers affected, the timing of their illnesses, and their hospital visits – may add weight to calls for a broader probe of whether the COVID-19 virus could have escaped from the laboratory.

It reported that current and former officials familiar with the intelligence about the lab researchers expressed a range of views about the strength of the report’s supporting evidence, with one unnamed person saying it needed ‘further investigation and additional corroboration.’ 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has since said he was ‘not convinced’ that COVID-19 developed naturally and called for an open investigation.

‘I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened,’ he said at a PolitiFact event on May 11 entitled: United Facts of America: A Festival of Fact-Checking.  

The former head of the Food and Drug Administration also said that the likelihood COVID-19 originated in a lab is growing while the odds that the coronavirus was transmitted from animals to humans grow longer.

‘The challenge is that the side of the ledger that suggests that this could have come out of a lab has continued to expand,’ Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who served as then-President Trump’s FDA commission from 2017 until 2019, told CBS News.

‘And a side of the ledger that suggests that this could have come from a zoonotic source, come out of nature, really hasn’t budged.’

Gottlieb said that there is enough evidence to rule out the earlier theory that coronavirus originated from a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan.

Gottlieb added:

‘And if anything, you can argue that that side of the ledger has contracted because we’ve done an exhaustive search for the so-called intermediate host, the animal that could have been exposed to this virus before it spread to humans.

Daily Mail has been asking if the virus stemmed from a Wuhan lab since April 2020

The Daily Mail has consistently questioned the early consensus that COVID-19 was transmitted to humans from animals.

Our reporters have dug into the details and challenged the assumptions about how the pandemic originated. 

APRIL 4, 2020: 

Did coronavirus leak from a research lab in Wuhan? The startling new theory is ‘no longer being discounted’ amid claims staff ‘got infected after being sprayed with blood’

Ministers fear that the coronavirus pandemic might have been caused by a leak from a Chinese laboratory, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Senior Government sources say that while ‘the balance of scientific advice’ is still that the deadly virus was first transmitted to humans from a live animal market in Wuhan, a leak from a laboratory in the Chinese city is ‘no longer being discounted’.

One member of Cobra, the emergency committee led by Boris Johnson, said last night that while the latest intelligence did not dispute the virus was ‘zoonotic’ – originating in animals – it did not rule out that the virus first spread to humans after leaking from a Wuhan laboratory. 

APRIL 15, 2020:

Mike Pompeo demands the truth from Beijing as the US investigates if COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan lab during experiments and China covered it up by blaming ‘wet’ food markets

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has demanded that China ‘come clean’ following reports that coronavirus originated in a Chinese laboratory, not as a bioweapon, but as part of bungling experiments to prove that Chinese scientists were superior to Americans in identifying emerging virus threats.

It comes after President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. is trying to determine whether the coronavirus first crossed to humans accidentally during experiments with bats at the Wuhan Institute of Virology Lab.

The afterword of the outbreak finally became public, Chinese leaders were quick to blame Wuhan’s ‘wet market’ where wild animals — though not bats — are sold for consumption, leading one source to tell Fox News the debacle is the ‘costliest government coverup of all time.’

MAY 2, 2020: 

Wuhan virus lab ‘cover-up’: Startling photos of scientists wearing little protection as they handle deadly bat samples vanish from the website of Chinese institute at the center of global suspicion over pandemic 

Pictures that appear to show slack safety standards at the Chinese laboratory at the center of international sus­picion over Covid-19 have been systematically deleted from its website – as Donald Trump continues to ramp up the pressure on Beijing over its potential role in the outbreak. 

During the past month, Wuhan’s Institute of Virology has removed photographs of scientists working in its laboratories and edited out references to visits by US diplomats who subsequently raised the alarm about the laboratory’s work on bats. 

US President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that he had seen intelligence that gave him a ‘high degree of confidence that the global crisis had its origins in the institute – a month after The Mail on Sunday first revealed that British Cabinet Ministers had received classified briefings raising the possibility of a leak from the institute. 

Downing Street did not take issue with President Trump’s remarks. ‘There are clearly questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the virus,’ a spokesman for Boris Johnson said. 

MAY 30, 2020:

Beijing now admits that coronavirus DIDN’T start in Wuhan’s market… so where DID it come from 

China has become used to public confessions on television. But this time the words came from one of the nation’s top officials and had seismic global implications.

‘At first, we assumed the seafood market might have the virus, but now the market is more like a victim,’ said Gao Fu, director of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

Gao’s initial analysis had made sense after previous outbreaks of zoonotic viruses (diseases that jump from animals to humans). Yet suspicion grew over the Chinese government’s failure to share data from animals sampled in the market following its early cover-ups.

JANUARY 2, 2021: 

China lab leak is the ‘most credible’ source of the coronavirus outbreak, says top US government official, amid bombshell, claims Wuhan scientist has turned whistleblower 

One of America’s most senior government officials says the most ‘credible’ theory about the origin of coronavirus is that it escaped from a laboratory in China.

Matthew Pottinger, who is President Donald Trump‘s respected Deputy National Security Adviser, told politicians from around the world that even China’s leaders now openly admit their previous claims that the virus originated in a Wuhan market are false.

Mr. Pottinger said that the latest intelligence points to the virus leaking from the top-secret Wuhan Institute of Virology, 11 miles from the market, saying: ‘There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus.’

JANUARY 9, 2021:

New cover-up fears as Chinese officials delete critical data about the Wuhan lab with details of 300 studies vanishing – including all those carried out by virologist dubbed Batwoman

The Chinese government is facing fresh accusations of a cover-up after officials deleted crucial online data about the laboratory suspected of being the source of Covid-19.

The Mail on Sunday can reveal that hundreds of pages of information relating to studies carried out by the top-secret Wuhan Institute of Virology have been wiped.

Details of more than 300 studies, including many investigating diseases that pass from animals to humans, published online by the state-run National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) are no longer available.

APRIL 24, 2021:

Worrying new clues about the origins of Covid: How scientists at Wuhan lab helped Chinese army in secret project to find animal viruses 

Scientists studying bat diseases at China‘s maximum-security laboratory in Wuhan were engaged in a massive project to investigate animal viruses alongside leading military officials – despite their denials of any such links.

Documents obtained by The Mail on Sunday revealed that a nationwide scheme, directed by a leading state body, was launched nine years ago to discover new viruses and detect the ‘dark matter of biology involved in spreading diseases.

Leave a Reply

HTML Snippets Powered By :